The most authentic way to discover mountains, lakes, and coasts
without losing touch with nature

Data, regulations, sustainability, and practical strategies for the new era of outdoor tourism in Italy

How to read this article

Campeggiare in Italia è un’idea semplice con un risultato enorme: dormi vicino a quello che vuoi esplorare. Le Dolomiti non sono solo una gita in giornata. I laghi non sono solo un punto foto. Le coste non sono solo “ombrellone e lettino.” Il campeggio ti mette dentro i tempi del posto: alba, vento, ombra, profumi — e anche le regole, che spesso cambiano a pochi chilometri di distanza.

Most camping articles tell you where to go. This one tells you how to think before you go. The analysis unfolds across four dimensions:

1. Sector Economics — verifiable market data (CISET, FAITA, Intesa Sanpaolo, Human Company) with two original micro-analyses: average spending per stay and the tourist pressure gradient.
2. Geographical Differences — what really changes between mountains, lakes, the hinterland, and coasts, citing specific facilities and regional regulations by law.
3. Environmental Impacts — soil compaction, light pollution, and waste management, with scientific research and quantified recovery times.
4. Future Design — five operational proposals for smarter, more accessible Italian camping that respects the landscape.
The problem with camping in Italy is not the number of campers, but the spatial distribution of tourist pressure.
This isn’t an article about the most beautiful places. It’s a framework for designing camping holidays that don’t consume the very landscape that makes them possible.

Outdoor tourism in Italy: the real numbers

The sector is no longer a niche. According to data presented at the 2025 Open Air Forum in Rome (FAITA Federcamping / HBenchmark / CISET Ca’ Foscari), the 2025 season reached 74 million stays, up 3.3% from 2024, with a total economic impact of €8.5 billion (+6.3%). In 2024, Italy recorded nearly 459 million total tourist stays (ISTAT), overtaking France as the second-ranked EU country. Outdoor tourism represents approximately 16% of the total volume.

Indicator Data Source
Total stays 2025 74 million (+3.3%) FAITA / CISET Ca’ Foscari
Turnover (direct + indirect) €8.5 billion (+6.3%) FAITA / HBenchmark
Outdoor facilities ~2,600 (1.3M beds/day) FAITA Federcamping
International guest share 52% of arrivals; DE leading (18.4M) Human Company / Eurostat
Average stay 6.5 nights/guest CISET / FAITA
Leading region (foreigners) Veneto (16.4M, 43.7%) Human Company Observatory
EU competitiveness index 122.1 (highest among the Big 4) SRM / Intesa Sanpaolo
September occupancy 31% (October: 12%) CISET forecast
Businesses investing (3 years) 70% — priority: energy efficiency SRM / Intesa Sanpaolo

Micro-analysis: average spending per stay

From available data, we can calculate a simple but revealing indicator. If the total turnover is €8.5 billion across 74 million stays, the average spending per stay is approximately €115. This includes direct and indirect spending. The SRM/Intesa Sanpaolo report estimates the direct added value at about €5 billion, equal to 4.8% of the national tourist added value. This data tells a specific story: outdoor tourism generates enormous volume but relatively low average spending compared to traditional hotels.

With an average spend of €115 per stay, outdoor tourism in Italy faces a structural paradox: huge weight in volume, relatively limited weight in value. True growth will come from the quality of the experience, not the number of pitches.

To put that €115 into perspective, a comparison with other segments is useful. Total tourist spending in Italy in 2024 is estimated at about €110 billion across 458 million total stays (ISTAT / Confindustria), equal to a national average of about €240 per stay. 5-star hotels, according to the Demoskopika report, generated €9 billion from 12.8 million stays, equivalent to approximately €700 per stay. The picture is clear: outdoor tourism produces twice the stays of luxury hotels, but at one-sixth the spending per unit. The margin for growth lies not in filling more pitches, but in raising the perceived and real value of the experience — better services, longer seasons, and broader accessibility.

Who goes camping and what it means for you

International visitors represent over 52% of arrivals. Germany dominates with 18.4 million stays, followed by the Netherlands (5M) and Switzerland (2.6M). Poland shows the strongest growth: +25% vs 2019. On the domestic front, there is a slight decline in Italian stays (-3% vs 2023, Human Company Observatory), attributed to reduced purchasing power. However, Tuscany leads Italian preferences with 5.6 million stays, followed by Veneto (3.7M) and Emilia-Romagna (3.3M).

Practical tip — Book months in advance for the North-East and major lakes in July and August. If you have flexibility: September (31% occupancy) and October (12%) offer lower prices, better availability, and a climate that is often ideal for trekking and cycling.

Seasonality: the future is already here

Lakeside campsites record 43% occupancy in September and 20% in October, driven by Northern European guests. In April or late September, a campsite on the Tuscan coast that charges €45/night in August might cost €25, with trails and pine forests all to yourself. Mountain campsites in Trentino offer excellent conditions until mid-October, with autumn foliage that is worth the trip alone.

Italy in the European context

The territorial competitiveness index calculated by SRM/Intesa Sanpaolo places Italy first among the four major European countries for outdoor tourism (122.1). France has nearly three times the number of facilities. Germany has a much lower share of international guests. Italy stands out for the highest average length of stay in Europe (6.5 nights vs 5.2 in France and 3.8 in Germany). Eurostat data indicates that outdoor tourism in Europe totaled 405.8 million stays in 2024.

Country Facilities Average stay Foreign share Stays 2024–25 Comp. index
Italy ~2,600 6.5 nights 52% 74 million 122,1
France ~7,800 5.2 nights 38% ~130 million* 109,5
Germany ~3,000 3.8 nights 15% ~42 million* 95,2
Netherlands ~2,300 4.1 nights 28% ~32 million* 88,7

* Estimates based on Eurostat 2024 and national reports. The competitiveness index is calculated by SRM/Intesa Sanpaolo.

Italy by campsite: what changes between regions

Micro-analysis: the tourist pressure gradient (operational tool)

A concept rarely used in camping guides but fundamental for making a good choice: the tourist pressure gradient. Italy has a very high spatial concentration. Four regions alone absorb nearly 60% of international outdoor stays: Veneto (16.4M), Tuscany (4.5M), Lombardy (3M), and Trentino-Alto Adige (1.8M). But this pressure is not distributed uniformly even within individual regions. It concentrates in coastal corridors and lakeshores, leaving valleys and the hinterland with densities ten or twenty times lower. To turn this concept into a decision-making tool, I propose a classification into four tiers.

Tier A — High pressure. More than 10 campsites within 20 km, hundreds of reviews per facility, full occupancy in July-August. Examples: southern shore of Lake Garda, Cavallino-Treporti, Romagna coast. Advantages: excellent services, connections, organized activities. Disadvantages: noise, traffic, need to book months in advance, high seasonal prices.
Tier B — Medium pressure. 3–10 campsites within 20 km, availability possible with 2–4 weeks’ notice. Examples: Lake Iseo, southern Tuscan coast, Piedmontese shore of Lake Maggiore. Good balance between services and tranquility.
Tier C — Low pressure. 1–3 campsites within 20 km, frequent availability even in August. Examples: lateral Alpine valleys (Val Vestino, Val Cannobina), Umbrian hills, inland Abruzzo. Fewer structured services but more silence, more nature, lower prices.
Tier D — Ultra-low pressure. Zero or 1 campsite within 20 km; farm-stays (agricampeggi), municipal rest areas, and bivouacking prevail. Examples: Lucanian Apennines, Sardinian hinterland, upper Val di Vara (Liguria). Maximum authenticity, minimal services, ideal for experienced travelers with self-sufficient equipment.

Mini-checklist: which tier are you in?

Before booking, take this quick test on your destination. Count the campsites within a 20 km radius on Google Maps or park4night. Check the number of Google reviews for the main facility (more than 500 = Tier A; 100–500 = Tier B; less than 100 = Tier C/D). Check if the facility shows availability less than 2 weeks before your desired date in July-August: if so, you are likely in Tier B, C, or D. Your goal is not to avoid Tier A, but to choose it consciously — knowing it involves advance booking, a higher budget, and more crowds in exchange for superior services and convenience.

Moving 50 km along the tourist pressure gradient can completely transform the experience: from crowds to silence, from “sold out” to free pitches.

Mountains: Dolomites, Alps, Apennines

The Dolomites are a UNESCO World Heritage site and are managed strictly. The distinction between bivouacking (one night, minimal equipment, above the tree line) and camping (more structured, more than 48 hours) is legally significant: violating it means risking fines and impacting soil and wildlife. Trentino-Alto Adige attracts 1.8 million international stays per year in outdoor facilities alone.

The practical challenge in the mountains is physical accessibility. A campsite “near the trails” can mean 400 meters of steep gravel. Camping Molveno (Trentino), overlooking the Dolomites with awards from Legambiente and the Touring Club, is a model: flat pitches, clear internal paths, waste sorting systems, and biodiversity protection in the adjacent natural park.

For astrotourism: the North-Eastern Alps offer some of the darkest skies in Italy. Val Visdende and Casera Razzo have been measured at Bortle 2 (Milky Way visible with faint shadows on the ground). Prato Piazza offers similar conditions. Data certified by the Astronomitaly network by Fabrizio Marra, which uses Sky Quality Meters for on-site measurements.

Great Lakes: anti-corridor strategy

The Lago di Garda Camping network includes nearly 20 facilities. Density brings advantages (cycle paths, ferries, services) but also the corridor effect: an almost continuous tourist strip with cumulative pressure on water, waste, and riparian ecosystems.

Practical strategy — Use the large lakes (Garda, Maggiore) as a base. Dedicate at least 1–2 nights to a smaller lake or lateral valley: Lake Iseo, Val Vestino, Val Cannobina. Fewer crowds, more nature, same macro-landscape.

Example of environmental excellence at the lake: Camping La Quercia in Lazise — among the first in Italy with ISO 14001 certification (late 80s), plastic compactors with reward points for guests, probiotic cleaning products for lake water quality, and a 20-hectare park with a 400-year-old oak registered by the WWF.

Hinterland: the hidden geography

Umbria, Marche, inland Abruzzo, Tuscan hills: continuous nature without continuous crowds. This is where agricampeggi (farm-stays) shine. Agri-Campsite Madonna di Pogi (Tuscany): pitches in the woods, private lake, ecological management. Agriturismo Mulinaccio (Maremma): far enough from light sources for genuinely dark skies. In some Apennine villages, municipal camping areas fund trail maintenance and support the local economy: every guest becomes a micro-infrastructure against depopulation.

Coasts and islands: spectacular, fragile

Dunes, pine forests, wetlands: ecosystems where modest disturbances accumulate. Camping Ca’ Savio (Cavallino-Treporti) has invested in sustainable water management, 9 recycling stations on the beach, photovoltaics, EV charging, and the elimination of single-use plastics. Union Lido Mare, among the first ISO 14001 in Italy, uses internal electric vehicles and collaborates with Village for All. These are not niche eco-resorts: they are models of sustainability applied to mass tourism.

Regulatory warning — In Sardinia, beach ordinances prohibit camping on beaches and non-designated areas. In Sicily, rest areas allow stops for up to 24 hours; beyond that, municipal authorization is required. Check before arriving.

The regulatory mosaic: region by region

In Italy, there is no single national law on wild camping. The Constitution guarantees freedom of movement, but jurisdiction is delegated to Regions, Municipalities, and Park Authorities. The distinction between bivouacking and camping is crucial: bivouacking (one night, sunset to sunrise, minimal equipment) is more tolerated; camping (more structured, over 48 hours) is prohibited or limited almost everywhere outside authorized facilities.

Region Wild Camping Bivouacking Regulation
Piedmont Allowed up to 48h where no official campsites exist; notify the Mayor Tolerated L.R. 54/1979
Aosta Valley Only above 2,500 m Tolerated at high altitude Regional Reg.
Veneto Prohibited outside designated areas Not provided for L.R. 40/1984
Emilia-Romagna Prohibited; high fines Not mentioned L.R. 16/2014
Tuscany Authorized in campsites; parks: organized camps ≤20 days Tolerated outside protected areas L.R. 16/2003
Lazio Mayor can authorize up to 15 days Tolerated with consent L.R. 59/1985
Sardinia Prohibited on beaches and non-designated areas Not tolerated on the coast Beach Ord. 2014+
Sicily Rest areas: up to 24h; organized camps: municipal authorization Tolerated in rest areas L.R. 14/1982

For campers and motorhomes: the Highway Code (D.Lgs. 285/1992) distinguishes “parking” (vehicle on its wheels) from “camping” (awning, tables, external pegs). Extend the awning = classified as camping = local regulations apply. Over 48 hours in the same spot = possible occupation of public land.

Rule of thumb — Before camping outside authorized facilities, check: (1) regional tourism law, (2) municipal ordinances, (3) regulations of the nearest protected area. Five minutes of checking avoids fines from €100 to €500+.

Environmental impact: the science behind the choices

Soil compaction: the damage that lasts generations

The most significant and least visible damage from camping is soil compaction: the reduction of pore volume that prevents water absorption, root growth, and the life of microorganisms. Research in Environmental Management shows that three years after a campsite closed, the most trampled areas showed minimal recovery. A review of 121 studies in the Canadian Journal of Forest Research estimates full recovery between 92 and 100 years (linear model) or 85% recovery in 105–124 years (logarithmic model). Research in the European Journal of Forest Research (von Wilpert and Schäffer, 2006) found zero signs of recovery below 4 cm depth up to 14 years after impact.

Soil compaction is not a temporary inconvenience. It is a wound that can outlast your grandchildren’s lives. Staying on designated pitches is not a courtesy: it is an ecological necessity.

The footprint of a typical holiday: tent vs. mobile home

No camping guide translates environmental research into concrete numbers. Let’s try. An average pitch in an Italian campsite occupies about 70–100 m². A 4-person tent directly affects about 8–12 m² of soil (tent footprint + vestibule), plus 20–30 m² of trampled area for daily movement. If the pitch is on a prepared surface and the guest stays within the boundaries, the impact is manageable. A mobile home on a fixed pitch occupies 25–35 m² of soil permanently and, according to Crippaconcept data presented at the 2025 Open Air Forum, generates about 780 kg CO₂eq/m² during assembly and ~1,100 kg CO₂eq/m² over the entire life cycle. For a 30 m² mobile home, this means about 23 tons of CO₂eq in assembly and 33 tons in the life cycle. A high-quality camping tent weighs 4–8 kg and has a negligible production carbon footprint by comparison. The difference doesn’t make the mobile home “wrong” — it offers comfort and accessibility that a tent cannot — but it makes visible the environmental cost hidden in different forms of camping. This is information for deciding, not for judging.

Light pollution: the invisible threat

Italy is among the most affected countries in Europe. Skies with Bortle ≤3 survive only in limited areas: Eastern Alps, parts of Sardinia, inland areas of Abruzzo and Basilicata. The Astronomitaly network (Fabrizio Marra) created the “Most Beautiful Skies in Italy” certification with instrumental measurements. DarkSky International recommends: shielded fixtures, warm LEDs (≤2700K), minimal intensity, and timers/sensors in common areas. For the camper: red-filter flashlight, low lanterns, lights off at bedtime.

A coastal campsite in a fragile pine forest that switches to warm, shielded LED lighting, reduces volume after 10 PM, and creates mandatory walkways over the dunes achieves a rare result: the environment recovers and the guest sleeps better, sees more stars, and hears the sea. Protection and comfort in the same direction.

Waste, water, carbon

Waste and water systems are the best predictor of a campsite’s quality. For campers: use only designated disposal points, do not wash in natural water sources, take away every micro-waste, and use biodegradable soap.

The quality of a campsite is recognized by its water and waste systems before its swimming pool.

Accessibility: every barrier is a lost customer

Real accessibility means the entire guest journey: arrival, parking, internal paths, pitch, toilets, common areas, and access to the beach or trails. The most rigorous framework in Italy is the Village for All (V4A) network, founded in 2008 by Roberto Vitali. V4A physically visits every facility with the patented V4AInside methodology: 6 evaluation categories, 80+ facilities across Italy and Croatia, downloadable guides in 3 languages, and accessible formats for the visually impaired.

At the 2025 Open Air Forum, Vitali presented data that redefines the business case: people with disabilities make up 17% of the EU population (80+ million); travelers over 60 represent 40% of tourist spending. “Every barrier is a lost customer, a missed opportunity, a broken promise,” Vitali summarized.

Concrete excellence. Village Florenz in Comacchio (Emilia-Romagna): has invested in accessibility since 2006, the only Italian facility to win the European Excellence Award for Accessible Tourism (Brussels, 2014). 20% of accommodations are fully accessible and V4A-certified. 21 units mapped for visually impaired guests with tactile references and Braille menus. Camping Bergamini in Peschiera del Garda: reception with magnetic induction for the hearing impaired, Braille menus, and signage with Accessibility QR Codes in 3 languages compatible with speech synthesis.

How to evaluate a campsite — Ask three precise questions: (1) Surface and slope of the parking→pitch path? (2) Size and position of grab bars in the adapted bathroom? (3) Step-free access to common areas, restaurant, and beach/trail? Precise answer = serious campsite. Vague reassurances = work not done.

Planning your trip: five expert steps

Step 1: Type of experience — Equipped campsite, farm-stay, motorhome rest area, touring with short stops, mountain bivouac: services, rules, and costs change. Decide before searching for locations.
Step 2: Shade, terrain, distances — In Italian summers, heat is the main threat. Check tree cover on Google Earth. Measure the distance from parking→pitch and pitch→bathroom: over 150 m on uneven ground = daily frustration with children or reduced mobility.
Step 3: Weather plan + Plan B — Summer storms are more intense, heatwaves longer. Use mountain-specific forecasts for Alpine valleys. Have an alternative: lower-altitude campsite, last-minute farm-stay, or a planned “rainy day” activity.
Step 4: Bookings and check-in — High season in top spots (Garda, Cavallino, Tuscan coast, Sardinia) requires months of advance booking. Many campsites do not accept arrivals after a certain time. Read the terms in full.
Step 5: Digital + verification — park4night, Campy, and aggregators: useful but imprecise. Cross-reference with the campsite website + Google Earth + a direct phone call. For areas without signal: download offline maps (Komoot, AllTrails, Outdooractive). It’s not just convenience: it’s safety.

Two mini-decision models: choose in 3 minutes

Model 1 — Which macro-area?

Answer three questions and the model will guide you to the most suitable macro-area.

Daily budget per pitch? Under €25 → Inland Central/South, farm-stays, rest areas. Between €25 and €45 → Smaller lakes, central-southern coast, mid-mountains. Above €45 → Great lakes, Venetian/Romagna coast, Dolomites in high season.
Period? July-August → avoid Tier A if you haven’t booked; consider the hinterland or mountains. June/September → Tier B for the best quality/price ratio. April-May/October → Tier C/D, farm-stays, Apennine villages.
Crowd tolerance? High → Tier A with all services. Medium → Tier B, smaller lakes or lateral valleys. Low → Tier C/D, hinterland, high mountains out of season.

Model 2 — Which type of facility?

First experience + little equipment + family → Equipped campsite (Tier A/B). Full services, immediate support, gentle learning curve.
Medium experience + own equipment + couple/friends → Farm-stay or Tier B/C campsite. More autonomy, more contact with the local area, lower costs.
Van/motorhome traveler + autonomous → Municipal rest area + farm-stays + touring stops. Maximum flexibility, pay attention to parking rules.
Expert + light equipment + mountain → Bivouac (where allowed) + base campsite in the valley. Check: minimum altitude, protected area regulations, specific weather.

Five proposals to transform Italian camping

These are not fantasies. Each proposal is based on existing technologies, tested models, or ongoing pilot projects.

1. Standardized sustainable pitch design

Proposed protocol: natural drainage (permeable surfaces), physical boundaries against lateral expansion, shading with native species, and accessible internal paths. Key parameter: maximum density limit per hectare (e.g., ≤40 pitches/ha in coastal areas, ≤25/ha in mountain areas), with annual monitoring of soil compaction. The SRM report notes that 70% of businesses plan new investments in the next 3 years: expanding the mandate to ecological pitch design would multiply environmental returns.

2. Capacity-aware booking with incentives

Proposed system: real-time occupancy visible to the user, automatic suggestion of alternatives within 30 km when a facility exceeds 80% capacity, 15–20% discount for arrivals by public transport, and a waste security deposit (€20–30) returned at the end of the stay if the pitch is left clean. The logic already exists in the capacity management systems of ski resorts and in access management for the Cinque Terre.

3. Certified dark-sky corridors

Connect camping facilities that adopt certified lighting standards (DarkSky International) into astrotourism corridors: Eastern Alps → Abruzzo → Basilicata → inland Sardinia. Each facility: shielded fixtures, LEDs ≤2700K, stargazing programming, and collaboration with Astronomitaly for certification. It’s not luxury: it’s the preservation of a measurable natural resource.

4. Participatory maintenance: the guest as co-manager

Guests who participate in an hour of trail cleaning or micro-waste collection develop a different relationship with the landscape. Proposal: formalize these activities into a network with measurable results (km of trail maintained, kg of waste collected, species monitored) and offer concrete benefits: stay discounts or access to reserved natural areas.

5. Accessibility as a condition for public funding

The V4A network has shown that accessible design increases quality for everyone: stable paths serve wheelchairs and strollers; QR code signage helps the visually impaired and foreign tourists; induction systems improve communication for all. Proposal: make V4A evaluation a condition for any public funding or certification related to outdoor tourism. The potential market (17% of EU population with disabilities + 40% of tourist spending from over 60s) makes the business case overwhelming.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is camping suitable for those with no experience?

Yes. Start with an equipped facility for 2–3 nights. You will understand the rhythms, real needs, and Italian logistics. Afterward, you can move toward more independent experiences with confidence.

Are wild camping and bivouacking the same thing?

No. Wild camping (structured settlement outside authorized facilities) is prohibited or limited almost everywhere. Bivouacking (one night, sunset→sunrise, minimal equipment) is more tolerated, especially in the mountains, but remains prohibited in many protected areas. Always check the specific rules of your destination.

North vs. South: what really changes?

North-East: dense infrastructure, high competitiveness, strong international clientele. Central-South: smaller campsites, rooted in the local context. The best trips combine both.

How do I choose a child-friendly campsite?

Forget the size of the playground. Focus on: shade on the pitches, real pitch→bathroom distance (≤80 m ideal), quiet zones for evening sleep, and effective enforcement of noise and light rules after 10 PM.

What is the single most effective action to reduce impact?

Stay on prepared surfaces. It prevents compaction on undisturbed ground, reduces erosion, and concentrates wear on areas designed to absorb it.

How to use this article in practice in 10 minutes

If you don’t have time to re-read everything, here are three concrete actions you can take right now.

1 thing to do today — Look up the regional camping regulations for your next destination (just Google “wild camping + [region name] + regional law”). Then check the light pollution in the area on lightpollutionmap.app: if it’s Bortle 3 or less, you have a starry sky worth protecting (and enjoying).
1 thing to ask the next campsite — Write to the campsite and ask: “What is the distance in meters and the slope from the parking lot to the pitch? How do you manage waste sorting and greywater?” The precision of the response tells you everything about the quality of management.
1 criterion for moving along the gradient — Count the campsites within 20 km on Google Maps. More than 10 = Tier A (top services, crowds, high prices). Fewer than 3 = Tier C/D (silence, fewer services, more authenticity). Decide where you want to be on this scale before looking for a specific campsite.

The core thesis

After analyzing data, regulations, environmental science, and operational models, the conclusions boil down to three:

1. Camping is no longer a niche but a national tourist infrastructure. 74 million stays and €8.5 billion in turnover place it at the center, not the margins, of the Italian tourism system.
2. Environmental impact depends on space management, not the number of visitors. Soil compaction lasts generations. The distribution of tourist pressure matters more than its total volume. The gradient is the key variable.
3. Design choices over the next 10 years will determine the quality of the Italian tourist landscape for the following 50. Pitch design, accessibility, lighting, booking systems: every infrastructural decision is an environmental decision.

Italy has a competitive advantage that no investment can artificially create: the variety and beauty of its landscapes. Outdoor tourism works because it brings people inside these landscapes. If infrastructure protects them while making them accessible, camping becomes one of the smartest — and fairest — ways to explore Italy. If infrastructure consumes them, the system loses the only thing it cannot replace.

Related terms

Outdoor tourism, Farm-stay (Agricampeggio), Motorhome rest area, Bivouac, Equipped campsite, Wild camping, Seasonality, Dark sky, Tourist accessibility, V4A, Tourist pressure gradient, Soil compaction

Main sources

SRM – Intesa Sanpaolo (2024). Outdoor Tourism, SRM: 70 million stays in Italy in 2024. Report on outdoor tourism in Italy: 70 million estimated stays in 2024, ~16% share of total stays, territorial competitiveness index 122.1, direct added value ~5 billion (4.8% of total tourism).
group.intesasanpaolo.com — Outdoor Tourism Italy first in Europe
ISTAT (2025). Customer movement in hospitality establishments – year 2024. Provisional data on total tourist stays: 458–466 million stays in 2024, a new record threshold, growth compared to 2023, increasing foreign share, and a slight increase in average length of stay.
Federturismo Summary · ISTAT Report
FAITA Federcamping & Forum Open Air (2025). Forum Open Air 2025 – quality, sustainability, and seasonal adjustment in outdoor tourism. Materials from the Forum Open Air 2025 on sector growth, over 70–74 million stays and turnover exceeding 8 billion euros, with a focus on sustainability, digitalization, and seasonal adjustment.
Official Forum Open Air 2025 website · Summary article (Camping Business)
Human Company & EY (2024–2025). Observatory on Outdoor Tourism and Future Travel Behaviors. Data on the share of European open-air travelers choosing Italy (approx. 24%), growth in online searches (+11.8%), and regional distribution of stays in campsites and holiday villages.
Quality Travel Summary · Outdoor Observatory Data (Camping Management)
Demoskopika (2024–2025). Luxury tourism in Italy: over 9 billion in direct spending. Analysis of the 5-star and 5-star luxury segment: approximately 9 billion euros in direct spending across ~12.8 million stays, equal to ~700 euros per stay, useful for comparison with average spending in outdoor tourism.
Official factsheet · Informative article
Village for All – V4A (2008–present). Accessible hospitality and outdoor tourism. European network for accessible tourism founded by Roberto Vitali, featuring the V4AInside methodology and over 80 certified facilities in Italy and Croatia; key data on the population with disabilities and spending by travelers over 60.
Official Village for All portal · Interview with Roberto Vitali (Corriere — Invisibili)
Cole, D. N. and Hall, T. E. Vegetation and soil recovery in wilderness campsites closed to visitor use. Environmental Management. Results on the multi-year persistence of compaction after site closure.
DeArmond, D. et al. Natural recovery of skid trails: a review. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. Review of 121 studies; estimated full recovery: 92–124 years.
von Wilpert, K. and Schäffer, J. (2006). Ecological effects of soil compaction and initial recovery dynamics. European Journal of Forest Research 125: 129–138. 14 years post-impact: zero signs of recovery below 4 cm depth.
Astronomitaly / Fabrizio Marra. Certification “The Most Beautiful Skies in Italy.” Light pollution measurements in Italian locations using a Sky Quality Meter.
astrotourism.com
DarkSky International (formerly International Dark-Sky Association). Guidelines for responsible outdoor lighting, Dark Sky Places database.
darksky.org
Regional camping regulations: Piedmont L.R. 54/1979; Valle d’Aosta regional regulation; Veneto L.R. 40/1984; Emilia-Romagna L.R. 16/2014; Tuscany L.R. 16/2003; Lazio L.R. 59/1985; Sardinia Bathing Ordinance 2014+; Sicily L.R. 14/1982. Highway Code: Legislative Decree. 285/1992. Environmental Consolidation Act: Legislative Decree. 152/2006.
Additional resources:
Ministry of Tourism — Outdoor tourism
FAITA / CISET 2024 — CISET Publication
Light pollution map — lightpollutionmap.app

Camping in Italy today means choosing a way of traveling that brings you closer to the landscapes and, if done correctly, respects them. Italian regions offer mountains, lakes, forests, and coasts with strong identities, and for this very reason, a local approach is needed: understanding the rules, choosing transparent facilities, and moving with care. By combining smart infrastructure, sustainable practices, and engaged communities, camping can become one of the most beautiful and responsible ways to explore Italy.